Startup Life
Technology. Startups. Venture Capital. My Life.
Technology. Startups. Venture Capital. My Life.
I have been reading the book Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond, and it has inspired a concept/theory on developing competitive online and mobile businesses that I am going to pursue further in my work with our portfolio companies.
July 18, 2009 - 7:31 pm
Just discovered this (and added to my Google Reader).
GGS is a wonderful read. One of the lessons I took from it is how organizations must take care not to be too rigid or authoritative in their operating policies — balance must be achieved between getting the disparate parts of an organization working together effectively and giving them room to be creative.
Diamond describes the contention between natural gas and electric lighting in Europe. Despite being developed in England, there was heavy lobbying pressure from the natural gas companies to prevent electric street lighting from being rolled out. Technology obeys no boundaries, and the continental countries (the Netherlands?) started using it. Soon, the advantages were too big to ignore and so eventually England switched over too. The various regimes in Europe — with different styles of government and market structures and geographic proximity — enabled innovation to avoid being entirely squashed.
Contrast that with China, which effectively was unified since 221 A.D. If one ruler decided to shut down the shipyards for a decade (something like this happened), there was no other region which could keep innovating.
This ties into companies that become big. You need to keep a wing or two that is allowed to deviate from the lockstep that other wings are on — even if it means suffering some inefficiencies. When I look to Microsoft, I see Microsoft Live and Microsoft Live Labs. Microsoft Live has a different feel from the rest of the corporation, and they release products that directly compete with existing windows products, like Live Photo Gallery, Live Mail, etc. I've found the 'Live' editions to be better than the ones that ship with Windows. I sorta joke that this group is like a splinter group within Microsoft, allowed to do things that groups who have to contend with heavy legacy support issues or existing-software integration don't have to.
With social networking tools, rather than outright banning them from employees or the workplace, let a small group or division use them. Sure, they'll make mistakes. But they'll keep an eye on the technologies, learn best practices, then they can share the info with the rest of the organization once the comfort level rises.
Sorry for the length of the post, but that's a business lesson I took away from GGS.
best,
Saket